SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Mad) 3774

S.S.SUNDAR
K. Ramasamy – Appellant
Versus
Ayyasamy – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. A. Arumugam
For the Respondent: Mr. M. Vallinayagam, M/s. D. Nallathambi

JUDGMENT :

The defendant in the suit in O.S.No.45 of 2009 on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court, Sankarankovil, is the appellant in this Second Appeal.

2. The respondent herein filed a suit in O.S.No.45 of 2009 for permanent injunction restraining the appellant herein from interfering with the plaintiff's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property. The suit property is an extent of 2.21.0 Hectares equivalent to 5.46 acres in Survey No.72/1, Kuruvikulam Village and Panchayat, Kalugumalai Sub Registration District, Sankarankovil Taluk.

3. The case of the respondent in the plaint are as follows:

3.1. The suit property was the self-acquired property of one Sangava Naicker. After his death, the property devolved on his three sons, namely, Seenivasa Naicker, Rajagopal Naicker, and Samy Ayyaa Naicker. After the death of Sangava Naicker, all the three sons of Sangava Naicker were enjoying the property in common. Thereafter, one of the sons, namely, Rajagopal Naicker died leaving behind his wife Tmt.Rajammal. Another son Samy Ayya Naicker died leaving behind his son Thiyagarajan. Seenivasa Naicker had one son by name Thirupathy. The plaintiff purchased the suit propert



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top