M.VENUGOPAL
N. Krishnagiri – Appellant
Versus
18 Steps Medias Private Limited – Respondent
Heard Mr. C.D. Sugumar, Learned counsel for the Appellant and Mr. R. Kannan, Learned counsel for Respondents 1 and 2.
2. The Appellant/Complainant has focused the instant Criminal Appeal No.630 of 2014 as against the judgment dated 20.6.2014 in S.T.C.No.1847 of 2012, passed by the Learned Judicial Magistrate I, Pollachi.
3. The Learned Judicial Magistrate I, Pollachi, while passing the impugned judgment in S.T.C.No.1847 of 2012 (filed by the Appellant/Complainant), at para 14, had observed that there was no direct evidence to show that the Accused, who are residing at a different village/place, had got acquainted with the Appellant/Complainant and further, when there was no evidence as to at which place the money was given to the Accused and added further when the Appellant/Complainant, after stating that the Accused had issued the 10.3.2012 case cheque, in the cross examination had deposed that he had received the undated cheque, which was a contradictory one. Also, the trial court had proceeded to observe, in its judgment, that the Complainant, in his evidence, had stated that A2 and A3 had issued Exs.P7 and P8 notices and in the cross-examination had stated that he does
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.