SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Mad) 159

G.JAYACHANDRAN
Selvaraj – Appellant
Versus
Uthirapathy – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. A. Muthukumar
For the Respondent: Mr. Srinath Sridevan

JUDGMENT :

The plaintiffs are the appellants herein. The suit is for declaration of right in respect of management and worship of Mariamman Temple situated at Periya Kuruvadi Village, Mannargudi Taluk.

2. The brief facts leading to the second appeal are as under:-

In Periya Kuruvadi Village, there is a ancient Mariamman Temple worshiped by the villagers and administratered by caste Hindus. The plaintiffs five in number belonged to Harijans community of that village. When they demanded to participate in the administration of the temple, it was denied by the defendants. Therefore, the suit was filed seeking declaration in respect of the right of the plaintiffs to participate in the temple festivals and be part of the administrative committee.

3. The defendants while admitting that the temple is open to all for worship irrespective of caste, they deny the allegation of the plaintiffs that Harijans are prevented from worshiping the deity. However, they ascertain their right to administer through body 14 members committee. Further, the defendants contended that in the said village, there is an another Mariamman Temple at Thoppu Street, which is exclusively administered by the Harijans commu


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top