SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Mad) 31

T.RAVINDRAN
Vasantha – Appellant
Versus
Pushpa – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. K.Chandrasekaran
For the Respondents: Mr. P.Seshadri

JUDGMENT :

Challenge in this second appeal is made to the Judgment and decree dated 30.04.2010 passed in A.S.No.8 of 2009 on the file of the Additional District Court, FTC II, Chennai, confirming the judgment and decree dated 22.07.2008 passed in O.S.No.7995 of 2006 on the file of the XVIII Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai.

2. The suit has been laid by the plaintiffs for partition and permanent injunction.

3. The case of the plaintiffs, in brief, is as follows:

The plaintiffs are the daughters of late Thiruvengada Naicker and Varadhammal. Thiruvengada Naicker died leaving behind his wife Varadhammal and sons Kannan, Natesan, Elumalai and Rajendran and daughters viz., the three plaintiffs. Varadhammal also died. Kannan died leaving behind the defendants 1 to 4 as his legal heirs. Another son Elumalai also died leaving his legal heirs as defendants 5 to 7. As such, Thiruvengada Naicker died leaving behind 7 branches of legal heirs. The suit property is the absolute property of Thiruvengada Naicker. The plaintiffs are also having portions in the suit property. After the death of Thiruvengada Naicker, the plaintiffs and the defendants are residing in the suit property and the same has n






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top