SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Mad) 239

T.RAVINDRAN
Nachimuthu – Appellant
Versus
Rengasamy – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appearing Parties : S. Kalyanaraman, T. Dhanyakumar

Judgment :-

S.A. No. 712 of 2011

1. Challenge, in this second appeal is made by the plaintiff against the judgment and decree dated 19.02.2010 passed in A.S.No.113 of 2005 on the file of the Sub Court, Namakkal, reversing the judgment and decree dated 18.04.2005 passed in O.S.No.289 of 2003 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Namakkal.

S.A. No.713 of 2011

Challenge, in this second appeal is made by the 1st defendant/plaintiff in O.S.No.289 of 2003 against the judgment and decree dated 19.02.2010 passed in A.S.No.112 of 2005 on the file of the Sub Court, Namakkal, reversing the judgment and decree dated 18.04.2005 passed in O.S.No.263 of 2003 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Namakkal.

2. The second appeals have been admitted and the following substantial question of law is formulated for consideration in the second appeals:-

“Whether the judgments and decrees of the first appellate court in dismissing the suit laid by the plaintiff and decreeing the suit laid by the first defendant are based upon the perverse findings and misdirected against the evidence on record?”

3. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per their ranking in the tr











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top