SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.NAGAMUTHU
S. Shanmugam – Appellant
Versus
Chandrasekaran – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :A. Muthukumar, Advocate.
For the Respondent:S. Sounthar, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

S. Nagamuthu, J.

The defendants in O.S.No.321 of 2004 on the file of the learned District Munsif, Sirkali, are the appellants herein. The sole respondent herein is the plaintiff in the suit. The said suit was filed by the respondent for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from in any manner interfering with his peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property. The suit property is admittedly, a vacant site measuring a total extent of 11 cents comprised in S.No.63/7 at Allivillagam Village, Sirkali Taluk, Nagapattinam District. The trial court decreed the suit by decree and judgment dated 16.06.2008. As against the same, the appellants herein filed an appeal suit in A.S.No.70 of 2008 before the learned Additional Sub Judge, Mayiladuthurai. By decree and judgment dated 06.11.2008, the first appellate court dismissed the appeal thereby confirming the decree and judgment of the trial court. As against the same, the appellants herein have come up with the present second appeal.

2. This second appeal has come up today for admission. The respondent has made appearance through his counsel.

3. The case of the plaintiff is that the suit property measuring 11 cents co











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top