Pushpa Sathyanarayana, J.

The above revision is filed by the eleventh defendant in the suit in O.S.No.98 of 2009 against the order refusing to reject the plaint under Order 7, Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

2. The plaintiffs had filed the suit praying for a decree that

(i) Nine mortgage deeds executed by the plaintiffs and their father in favour of the defendants 1 to 10 and one Venugopal Iyer, father of the defendants 2, 3 and 9 and Jayalakshmi wife of the third defendant for a sum of Rs.13 lakhs had been discharged

(ii) Consequentially, directing the defendant to hand over possession of the suit property and the original mortgage deeds with endorsement of discharge.

(iii) For cancellation of the sale certificate issued to one P.E. Ramakrishnan, husband of the eleventh defendant in E.P.No.141 of 1981 in O.S.No.717 of 1978 on the file of the Sub-Court, Dindigul.

(iv) For a declaration that the sale deed executed in favour of the fourteenth defendant is void and for permanent injunction restraining the defendants 2 to 14 from alienating the suit properties.

3. The above suit was transferred to the Additional District Court (Fast Track), Dindigul. The defendant has yet filed