SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

M.V.MURALIDARAN
B. Amutha – Appellant
Versus
Anandhi Sankara Narayanan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: M/s. V. Srimathi
For the Respondent: R. Bharath Kumar

ORDER :

Mr. M.V. Muralidaran, J.

The plaintiff in O.S. No. 121 of 2012 is the revision petitioner before this Court. Challenging the order passed by the learned Principal District Munsif, Poonamallee in I.A. Noo.1471 of 2012 in O.S. No. 121 of 2012, rejecting the request made by the petitioner for appointing an Advocate Commissioner and directing him to inspect the suit property, measure the same, note down the physical features, with the help of respective Taluk Surveyors and submit his report along with rough sketch in the said O.S. No. 121 of 2012.

2. The case of the plaintiff is that she has purchased the suit schedule of property situated at Thundalam Village, comprised in S. No. 64/1, Ambattur Taluk, Thiruvallur District, measuring to an extent of 1062 sq. ft. from (1) K. Ramu, (2) K. Babu and (3) K. Shanmugam, who are residing at No. 50, Perumal Koil street, Numbal, Chennai-77, have executed a General Power of Attorney in favour of K. Venkatesan S/o Late.Kathirvelu, residing at No. 9, Kannabiran Cross Street, Numbal, Chennai-77, registered as Document No. 795/2004, Book No. 4, on the file of SRO-Kundrathur, dated 15.04.2004. Originally, there was a small hut in the suit schedul










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top