SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.S.SUNDAR
Yesudhas – Appellant
Versus
Primala Regu – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. S. Xavier Rajini, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. P. Prabhakaran, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

S.S. Sundar, J.

The plaintiffs 2 to 5 in the suit in O.S.No.117 of 2004 (originally it was O.S.No.24 of 1997) on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Nagercoil, are the appellants in the second appeal. The appellants are the legal heirs of one C.Rajammal, who is the first plaintiff in the suit.

2. It was the case of the first plaintiff in the suit that the defendant borrowed a sum of Rs.50,000/- as loan on 12.03.1994 and had executed a Rekai acknowledging receipt of Rs.50,000/- in favour of the first plaintiff. It was the further case of the first plaintiff that the defendant had not paid either the principal or interest towards repayment of loan. It was also the case of the first plaintiff that the defendant did not pay the amount despite several demands and that the defendant is liable to pay a sum of Rs.67,000/- as on the date of filing the suit and hence, the suit was filed for recovery of a sum of Rs.67,000/-.

3. The respondent/defendant filed a written statement denying the receipt of Rs.50,000/- from the first plaintiff and the liability to pay any amount to the first plaintiff. However, in the later part of the written statement, the respondent/defendant
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top