SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

M.DURAISWAMY
V. Kaliaperumal Udayar – Appellant
Versus
T. Krishna Naicker – Respondent


Advocates:
For applt. : Mr.R.Krishnan
For respts. : Mr.S.Krishnasamy

J u d g e m e n t:-The above Second Appeal arises against the Judgement and decree in A.S.No.266 of 1993 on the file of the learned Principal District Judge, Salem confirming the judgement and decree in O.S.No.167 of 1988 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Salem.

2. The plaintiff in the suit is the appellant in the Second Appeal. The respondents herein are the defendants in the suit. The plaintiff filed the suit in O.S.No.167 of 1988 on the file of Principal District Munsif, Salem for specific performance.

3. The brief case of the plaintiff is as follows:

The suit properties originally belong to one A.Marimuthu Udayar. The said Marimuthu Udayar sold the suit properties to the first defendant on 8.2.1993 and on the same day, the first defendant executed an agreement of reconveyance to reconvey the properties within a period of 5 years if the sale price of Rs.3,500/- is repaid by the said Marimuthu Udayar to the first defendant. The said Marimuthu Udayar assigned the above said right of reconveyance in favour of the plaintiff on 29.4.1983 for proper and valid consideration of Rs.10,000/-. The said assignment dated 29.4.1983 was informed to the first defendant by the

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top