SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Mad) 285

P.DEVADASS
S. Nirmaladevi – Appellant
Versus
T. R. Rangasamy – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: S. Arjun for S. Gunalan
For the Respondent: M. Isutiaq Ahmed

JUDGMENT :

This revision arises out of allowing I.A.No.871 of 2011 in O.S.No.650 of 2007 filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act on the file of the learned I Additional Sub-Judge, Coimbatore.

2. The respondent/defendant owns Nanja lands measuring about 1 acre 9 cents comprised in Survey No.554/1A, situate in Mettupalayam in Coimbatore District.

3. Plaintiff, based on a Sale Agreement dated 12.3.2004 executed by the defendant filed the suit in O.S.No.650 of 2007 for specific performance with respect to the said property as against the defendant. On the first hearing date, namely, on 13.12.2007, the defendant was set ex parte. Thereafter, ex parte decree was passed. Plaintiff has become the decree holder. She filed E.P.No.129 of 2010 for compulsory execution of Sale Deed. The defendant opposed the execution contending that no suit summon was served upon him and he came to know about the ex parte decree only after receiving notice from the Execution Court.

4. In the Trial Court, the defendant filed I.A.No.871 of 2011 under Section 5 of Limitation Act to condone the delay of 1,202 days caused in filing the petition to set aside the said ex parte decree.

5. The said petition was hotly contes














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top