N.SATHISH KUMAR
Satish Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State, rep. By Inspector of Police, CBI/BS & FC/Bangalore – Respondent
This Criminal Revision has been filed as against the order passed by the learned trial Court in Crl.M.P.No.7857 of 2015 in C.C.No.56 of 2000 filed by the petitioner for the relief of fixing the specific period of ten years time for renewal of his Passport.
2. The learned trial Court, taking into consideration of the pendency of the Criminal Case against the petitioner and also the Notification issued by the Government of India, Ministry of External Affairs, dated 25.08.1993, passed an order only for return of the Passport to the petitioner for the renewal aspect and left all the remaining aspects as per the Notification. Aggrieved over the same, the present revision has been preferred by the petitioner.
3. The main crux of the argument of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he is not willing to visit the abroad without conclusion of the trial. However, if the specific period for renewal of the Passport is not fixed by the Court, the renewal will be done only for the period of one year as per the Notification of the Government of India, Ministry of External Affairs, dated 25.08.1993. Hence, it is the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that this Cour
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.