SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Mad) 994

V.BHARATHIDASAN
K. Saravana Prabu – Appellant
Versus
P. Krishnakumar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. C. Munusamy
For the Respondent: Mr. S. Sathiaseelan

ORDER :

The petitioner is an accused in C.C.No.87 of 2013 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No. I, Dharmapuri. The respondent/complainant filed a private complaint against the petitioner for an offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act. The Trial Court, convicted the petitioner/accused and sentencing him to undergo one year simple imprisonment and directed to pay the cheque amount of Rs.9,50,000/- as compensation under Section 357(3) Cr.P.C., and in default of payment of compensation amount, the accused is directed to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months. Challenging the above said conviction and sentence, the petitioner filed an appeal in C.A.No.40 of 2013 on the file of the Principal District Court, Dharmapuri. The lower appellate Court dismissed the criminal appeal by confirming the conviction and sentenced imposed by the trial Court. Now, Challenging the same, the present criminal revision case has been filed.

2. The case of the respondent/complainant is as follows:-

The petitioner/accused borrowed a sum of Rs.9,50,000/- as hand loan from the complainant for his family expenses and for developing his business. In order to discharge the a



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top