G.JAYACHANDRAN
Mohammed Moosa – Appellant
Versus
Muthaiah – Respondent
The revision petitioner herein is the plaintiff. In his suit O.S.No.70/2003 on the file of the District Munsif, Thirumangalam, the relief sought is declaration of title and consequential mandatory injunction regarding the suit schedule property and removal of superstructure put up in the suit property. After contesting the suit for 13 years, after examination of DW4 and when the trial is about to be completed, the plaintiff realised certain defect in his suit. Realising that if the defect is not cured, it will lead to dismissal of the suit has filed I.A.No.289/17 under Order 23 Rule 1(3) CPC to withdraw the suit with liberty to institute fresh suit.
2. The Trial Court considering the nature of the relief sought and the fresh facts put forth for seeking liberty to withdraw and institute fresh suit has held that the defect in the plaint is not a formal defect which could be cured by permitting to withdraw and file fresh suit. While in the plaint, the plaintiff has averred that he is the owner of the suit property upon which the defendants have encroached and put up construction illegally which warrants declaration of title and mandatory injunction to remove the superstructure,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.