SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Mad) 975

G.JAYACHANDRAN
Mohammed Moosa – Appellant
Versus
Muthaiah – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. T.R. Jeyapalam

ORDER :

The revision petitioner herein is the plaintiff. In his suit O.S.No.70/2003 on the file of the District Munsif, Thirumangalam, the relief sought is declaration of title and consequential mandatory injunction regarding the suit schedule property and removal of superstructure put up in the suit property. After contesting the suit for 13 years, after examination of DW4 and when the trial is about to be completed, the plaintiff realised certain defect in his suit. Realising that if the defect is not cured, it will lead to dismissal of the suit has filed I.A.No.289/17 under Order 23 Rule 1(3) CPC to withdraw the suit with liberty to institute fresh suit.

2. The Trial Court considering the nature of the relief sought and the fresh facts put forth for seeking liberty to withdraw and institute fresh suit has held that the defect in the plaint is not a formal defect which could be cured by permitting to withdraw and file fresh suit. While in the plaint, the plaintiff has averred that he is the owner of the suit property upon which the defendants have encroached and put up construction illegally which warrants declaration of title and mandatory injunction to remove the superstructure,













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top