SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Mad) 1174

RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN
M. Thangavel – Appellant
Versus
R. Rajendran – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. S. Anandchandrasekar for M/s.Sarvabhuman Associates.

JUDGMENT :

The defeated second defendant is the appellant herein.

2. The plaintiffs filed the suit, in O.S.No.328 of 1995, before the learned Principal District Munsif, Pudukottai, seeking the relief of partition and separate possession of 3/4th share in the suit properties and for costs.

3. After contest, the learned Principal District Munsif, Pudukottai, by Judgment and Decree, dated 31.07.1997, dismissed the suit.

4. Aggrieved by the Judgment and Decree passed by the learned Principal District Munsif, Pudukottai, the plaintiffs preferred an appeal, in A.S.No.157 of 1997, before the learned Principal District Judge, Pudukottai.

5. After contest, the learned Principal District Judge, Pudukottai, by Judgment and Decree, dated 31.03.1999, allowed the appeal, set aside the Judgment and Decree of the learned Trial Judge and passed a Preliminary Decree allotting 1/4th share to each of the plaintiffs.

6. Challenging the correctness of the Judgment and Decree passed by the learned Principal District Judge, Pudukottai, the defeated second defendant has preferred the present second appeal.

7. The brief averments of the plaint that are necessary to decide this appeal are as follows:

The suit proper








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top