SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Mad) 659

B.GOKULDAS
Deepa – Appellant
Versus
S. P. Navaneetha Krishnan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. C.S. Dhanasekaran.
For the Respondent: Mr. P.G. Perumal Pandian, Amicus Curiae.

JUDGMENT :

This Criminal appeal is filed against the judgment dated 08.04.2008 passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.II, Coimbatore in CA.No.540 of 2007 acquitting the respondent and by setting aside the conviction and sentence passed by the Judicial Magistrate No.VII, Coimbatore in STC.No.3045 of 2005 dated 22.11.2007.

2. The brief facts of the case are as follows :-

The accused approached the complainant and borrowed a sum of Rs.5,00,000/-, for business purpose and the accused also issued a cheque drawn from Vijaya Bank, Saibaba Colony dated 05.11.2005. The complainant presented the cheque in her account Canara bank, Saibaba Colony, on 11.11.2015. The said cheque was returned with an endorsement "insufficient balance". On 16.11.2005, the complainant sent notice to the accused, but, the accused refused to receive the notice and the same was retuned on 25.11.2005. Hence, the complainant preferred the complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

3. The complainant in order to prove her case examined herself as PW1 and her father as PW2 and produced the cheque, bank memo, debit advice, advocate notice, acknowledgment card, Certificate














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top