SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Mad) 515

M.V.MURALIDARAN
Rajinikumari – Appellant
Versus
Ethirajan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. P. Thirupathi Raj.
For the Respondent: Mr. V. Anand.

ORDER :

1. The first defendant in O.S. No. 480 of 2004 is the civil revision petitioner before this Court, challenging the order in I.A. No. 311 of 2013 in O.S. No. 480 of 2004, on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court, Poonamallee.

2. The case of the petitioner/first defendant is that the above suit has been filed by the first respondent/plaintiff in O.S. No. 357 of 2000, on the file of the Sub-Court, Poonamallee for declaration of the suit B schedule property as his absolute property and for declaration that "D" Schedule property as public pathway for mandatory injunction to remove the super structure put up by the petitioner/first defendant on the "B" and "D" schedule property, the suit has been filed against the 2nd defendant, who is Mr. Mohan Babu.

3. It is also stated that along with one Jagatheesan, the above 2nd defendant had sold the "B" and "D" schedule property to the petitioner/1st defendant, the said suit in O.S. No. 357 of 2000 was subsequently transferred to the learned Additional District Munsif, Poonamallee, because of the enhancement of pecuniary jurisdiction of the Court and it was re-numbered as O.S. No. 480 of 2004.

4. The petitioner/first defendant also






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top