SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Mad) 831

M.SATHYANARAYANAN
N. Parameshwari – Appellant
Versus
D. Subramanian – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. G. Magesh Kumar
For the Respondent: Mr. R. Karthikeyan

JUDGMENT :

The defendants who lost before the Courts below are the appellants herein.

2. The facts leading to the filing of this Second Appeal, briefly narrated, are as follows:-

[a] The respondent herein filed a suit in OS.No.168/2013 on the file of the Court of Subordinate Judge, Perundurai, Erode District, against the appellants herein praying for the specific performance of the Agreement of Sale dated 05.11.2012 (Ex.A5) and other consequential relief or in the alternate, to direct the defendants to pay a sum of Rs.2,34,300/- with subsequent interest on Rs.2,00,000/- till the date of payment and also for permanent injunction, restraining the defendants or their agents, men or servants from alienating or encumbering the property.

[b] The respondent/plaintiff would further aver among other things that the suit property was originally belong to one P. Palanisamy-father of the appellants herein/defendants and on 05.11.2012, he entered into a written Agreement of Sale and executed the Sale Agreement in his own handwriting in respect of the suit property and also handed over the possession of suit property as well as the original Sale Deed dated 17.08.1961(Ex.A6).

[c] The terms of the agre










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top