SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Mad) 409

G.JAYACHANDRAN
M. Selvakumar – Appellant
Versus
Mariammal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. P. Senthur Pandian.
For the Respondent: Mr. V. Meenakshisundaram.

ORDER :

1. This revision petition is filed against the dismissal of the amendment petition filed by the revision petitioner in his suit O.S. No. 366/13. Originally, the suit was filed for permanent injunction against the landlord and the tenant, on the ground that the revision petitioner is a transferee of tenancy rights under the original tenant. Later, he sought for an amendment of his prayer into delivery of vacant possession of the suit property evicting the 2nd respondent/2nd defendant (landlord) from the suit property.

2. The case of the revision petitioner is that the suit property which is owned by the 2nd defendant was let out for rent to the 1st defendant Mariammal and she had been enjoying the property as a cultivating tenant protected under the Tamil Nadu Cultivating Tenants (Protection) Act, 1955. While so, in the eviction proceedings initiated by the landlord before the revenue authority in TCTP No. 14 of 2007, the revision petitioner filed an application to get himself impleaded as a party respondent, which was dismissed by the revenue authority. Against the said order, he has preferred a revision before this Court in CRP (MD) No. 574/16 and the same is pending.

3. Whil









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top