SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Mad) 321

G.JAYACHANDRAN
R. Venkatachalam – Appellant
Versus
Tmt. Kullammal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. T.S.R. Venkataramana

ORDER :

The revision petitioner is the decree holder in the suit for specific performance based on the sale agreement dated 22.04.1983 with the defendant.

2. The suit is in respect of 4 items of properties. The Trial Court in O.S.No.778/84 as well the first appellate court in A.S. No. 105/93 have held in favour of the revision petitioner. Consequent to the decree of specific performance, sale deed has been executed by the Additional District Munsif, Dindigul in E.P.No.10/98 on 19.04.2001. Thereafter, the revision petitioner has filed execution petition for delivery of possession in E.P. No. 268/2002.

3. Delivery of items 1 to 3 were recorded on 18.03.2008. In respect of 4th item of property, execution petition was closed since the survey number of the property was not in consonance with the four boundaries. The revision petitioner has filed the subsequent execution petition in E.P.No.77/2012, wherein the description of the property, he has stated that the property to be delivered is 40 cents of land in S.No.524/13 in Periyakottai Village bounded by the punja lands of Nagammal-South, Rengasamy-West, Ayyarmalar-North and Paraipatti Road-East. As a note, he has stated that though in the

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top