T.RAVINDRAN
M. Srinivasan – Appellant
Versus
M. V. Mohammed – Respondent
The suit has been laid by the plaintiff for possession, perpetual injunction and mesne profits.
2. The averments contained in the plaint are briefly stated as follows:
The suit properties are the ancestral joint family properties and the subject matter of the suit for partition in C.S.No.947 of 1990 on the file of the High Court, Madras. The said suit was ultimately compromised and the schedule-II property along with other properties were allotted to the plaintiff's share under the compromise decree passed in the above suit dated 30.10.1990. The Corporation assessment and EB Connection, in respect of the schedule-II property, stand in the name of the plaintiff. The plaintiff became entitled to all the properties allotted to him in the compromise decree as aforementioned and the defendants were the tenants originally under the father of the plaintiff in respect of the schedule-1 property marked as A,B,C,D and coloured red in the plan attached to the plaint. The plaintiff as the landlord filed a suit in O.S.No.6182 of 1992 on the file of the VIII Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai, for recovery of possession of the schedule -1 property from the defendants and the defendants
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.