Teekaa Raman, J.

1. The unsuccessful plaintiffs are the appellants herein.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per the ranking before the Trial Court.

3. The plaintiffs filed the suit, in O.S. No. 39 of 1999, before the learned District Munsif, Kovilpatti, for the relief of declaration and injunction.

4. After contest, the learned District Munsif, Kovilpatti, by Judgment and Decree, dated 22.01.2003, dismissed the suit.

5. Aggrieved by the Judgment and Decree passed by the learned District Munsif, Kovilpatti, the plaintiffs preferred an appeal, in A.S. No. 22 of 2003, before the learned Subordinate Judge, Kovilpatti.

6. After contest, the learned Subordinate Judge, Kovilpatti, by Judgment and Decree, dated 12.11.2005, dismissed the appeal and confirmed the Judgment and Decree passed by the learned District Munsif, Kovilpatti.

7. Challenging the correctness of the Judgment and Decree passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Kovilpatti, the unsuccessful plaintiffs have preferred the present second appeal.

8. The brief averments of the plaint that are necessary to decide this appeal are as follows:

The suit property and other properties were initially owned