Chinnathambi @ Subramani [A1] vs State Rep. by The Inspector of Police

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2017 Supreme(Mad) 1412

S.NAGAMUTHU, P.N.PRAKASH, N.AUTHINATHAN
Chinnathambi @ Subramani [A1] – Appellant
Versus
State Rep. by The Inspector of Police – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : N. Manokaran
For the Respondent: P. Govindarajan
For the Amicus Curiae : A. Raghunathan

JUDGMENT :

S. Nagamuthu, J.

The appellant is the 1st Accused in S.C.No.2 of 2013 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Tirupur, Tirupur District. There were two other accused by name (1) Sakthivel, S/o. Palanisamy and (2) Natraj, S/o. Muthusamy Gounder, who were arrayed as Accused Nos.2 and 3 respectively in the said case. The trial court framed as many as seven charges against the accused as detailed below:-

Charge Number	Charges framed against	Penal provision under which Charge(s) framed
(1)	A1 to A3	Section 449 of IPC
(2)	A1 to A3	Section 457 of IPC
(3)	A1	Section 302 of IPC
(4)	A2 and A3	Section 302 r/w 34 of IPC
(5)	A2	Section 201 of IPC
(6)	A1 and A3	Section 201 r/w 34 of IPC
(7)	A1 to A3	Section 397 of IPC

The trial court, by judgment dated 08.06.2016, convicted all the three accused under various penal provisions of Indian Penal Code and sentenced them accordingly, as detailed below :-

Accused who was found guilty under charges	Penal provision under which conviction was recorded	Quantum of sentence imposed on t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2017 Supreme(Mad) 1412

S.NAGAMUTHU, P.N.PRAKASH, N.AUTHINATHANChinnathambi @ Subramani [A1] – AppellantVersusState Rep. by The Inspector of Police – Respondent

Cases Referred (14)

S.NAGAMUTHU, P.N.PRAKASH, N.AUTHINATHAN
Chinnathambi @ Subramani [A1] – Appellant
Versus
State Rep. by The Inspector of Police – Respondent