SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Mad) 1483

S.NAGAMUTHU, N.AUTHINATHAN
Muniyandi – Appellant
Versus
State, rep. by Inspector of Police, Roshani Police Station, Thindivanam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. R. Ragunathan, Sr. Counsel
For the Respondent: Mr. P. Govindarajan, Addl. P.P

JUDGMENT :

S. Nagamuthu, J.

The appellants in Crl.A.No.284 of 2016 are the accused Nos.1, 9, 10, 11, 12, 16, 17, 13, 15, 28, 29, 34, 36 and 26 in S.C.No.324 of 2014, on the file of the I Additional and Sessions Judge, Tindivanam. Including these appellants, there were a total number of 50 accused in the case. By judgment dated 5.4.2016, the trial Court convicted the appellants in Crl.A.No.284 of 2016 and sentenced them accordingly, as detailed below:

Sl. No

Rank of accused

Conviction

Sentence

1.

A1, A9, A10, A11, A12, A16 and A17

U/s.302 IPC

Imprisonment for life with fine of Rs.2,500/-, each, in default, two months simple imprisonment.

2.

A13, A15, A16, A28, A29, A34, A36

U/s.324 IPC

Rigorous Imprisonment for three years with a fine of Rs.2,500/-, each, in default, two months simple imprisonment.

3.

A26

U/s.326 IPC

Rigorous Imprisonment for five years with a fine of Rs.2,5000/-, in default, two months simple imprisonment.

They were acquitted from the other charges. Challenging the said conviction and sentences, they have come up with Cr




















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top