Mr. M. Venugopal, J.

The Appellant/Accused has preferred the instant Criminal Appeal before this Court (as an aggrieved person) as against the Judgment dated 31.01.2014 in S.C.No.58 of 2012 passed by the Learned Sessions Judge, Mahalir Neethimandram, Fast Track Mahila Court, Thiruppur.

2. The Learned Sessions Judge, Mahalir Neethimandram, Fast Track Mahila Court, Thiruppur, while passing the impugned Judgment in S.C.No.58 of 2012 on 31.01.2014, had, among other things, observed that the prosecution had proved the charge levelled against the Appellant/Accused under Section 306 I.P.C. beyond reasonable doubt, by placing cogent evidences and by examining proper witnesses and filing necessary documents. Viewed in that perspective, the Appellant/Accused was convicted under Section 306 I.P.C. by sentencing him to undergo seven years Rigorous Imprisonment and also directed him to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default of payment of said fine amount, he was further directed to undergo six months Simple Imprisonment. The period already undergone by the Appellant/Accused was directed to be set off in terms of Section 428 Cr.P.C.

3. Challenging the correctness and legality of the Judgmen