SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Mad) 1467

S.NAGAMUTHU, N.AUTHINATHAN
Subru @ Subramani – Appellant
Versus
State, rep. by The Inspector of Police, Royakottai Police Station, Krishnagiri District – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Shajahan for M/s. S. Bagavathi Raj, Advocates.
For the Respondent: Mr. P. Govindarajan, Addl. Public Prosecutor.

JUDGMENT :

S. Nagamuthu, J.

A gang rapist - it is alleged - who stands convicted for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 506(ii), 392 read with Section 379 IPC, 376(D) IPC and under Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Women Harassment Act, has come up with this appeal, challenging the conviction and sentences. He is the second accused in S.C. No.30 of 2015, on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Fast Track Mahila Court, Krishnagiri. There were three other accused in this case, by name, C. Prakash, I.G. Mani @ Mani and T. Prakash. The trial Court framed as many as eight charges against all the four accused, as detailed below :

SI. No.

Charges (Section of law)

accused

1.

U/s.341 of the Indian Penal Code

A1 to A4

2.

U/s.323 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code

A1 to A4

3.

U/s.506(ii) read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code

A1 to A4

4.

U/s.354 of the Indian Penal Code

A1

5.

U/s.392 IPC read with Section 379 IPC

A1 and A4

6.

U/s.376(D) of the Indian Penal Code

A1 & A4

7.

67(A) Information















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top