SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Mad) 3908

S.S.SUNDAR
R. Mookkammal – Appellant
Versus
M. Pandiarajan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. R. Murali.
For the Respondent: Mr. S.A. Ajmal Khan.

JUDGMENT :

S.S. Sundar, J.

1. Challenging the Judgment and Decree passed by the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Madurai in A.S. No. 93 of 2009, dated 30.06.2011, confirming the Judgment and Decree in O.S. No. 114 of 2007, dated 16.02.2009, passed by the learned District Munsif, Melur, this Second Appeal has been filed.

2. This Second Appeal has been filed by the plaintiff in the suit in O.S. No. 114 of 2007 on the file of the learned District Munsif, Melur. The appellant/plaintiff filed a suit in O.S. No. 114 of 2007 for specific performance in respect of a Sale Agreement, dated 19.11.2000 and for a consequential relief of permanent injunction restraining the defendant from alienating the suit property.

3. Brief facts as set out in the plaint are as follows:-

The suit property belonged to the respondent/defendant and the suit property is measuring an extent of 84 cents in R.S. No. 95/5 in Maruthur Village, Melur Taluk. The respondent purchased the suit property under the sale deed, dated 29.08.1986. The respondent approached the appellant and offered to sell the suit property







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top