SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Mad) 1489

N.SATHISH KUMAR
Kirthana – Appellant
Versus
Vinaya Krishnan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Plaintiff : Mr. K.V. Babu.
For the Defendant : Mr. T. Saikrishnan.

JUDGMENT :

N. Sathish Kumar, J.

1. The suit is filed for recovery of a sum of Rs. 50,00,000/- towards liquidated damages together with interest at the rate of 18% per annum from the date of plaint till the date of realization.

2. The case of the plaintiff is that in the year 2008, there was a discussion between Mrs. Ramya Krishnan, a cine artist who had expressed her interest about making an entry in the small screen industry to the plaintiff. Prior to few months to the said discussion, the plaintiff had branched out from her mother namely Ms. Kutty Padmini, who is also a leading child artist, now producing various serials in the small screen industry and the plaintiff started a company called "Satarlight Works" and when the said Mrs. Ramya Krishnan in the said conversation told the plaintiff that her company "Rithvik Dream Visuals", a company which was lying idle for about 3 years and the said company's production was only being a coffee and chat show in the Gemini T.V. and that she wanted her sister Ms. Vinaya Krishnan to get into production, the plaintiff has discussed with h




























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top