SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Mad) 1511

M.M.SUNDRESH
N. Manickam – Appellant
Versus
R. Saraswathi – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. I.C. Vasudevan
For the Respondents: Mr. P. Immanuel Prakasam

JUDGMENT :

M.M. Sundresh, J.

The plaintiff, who lost before both the Courts belowin a suit for partition, is the appellant herein.

2. The brief facts are that the suit property to the extent 1710 sq.ft. was originally purchased by Nallakumara Gounder. He had one son by name Karumana Gounder. His wife purchased another extent of 462 sq.ft. on 15.09.1930. Nallakumara Gounder died and Karumana Gounder died on 24.04.1968 and his wife Nallammal died in the year 1987 respectively. Thus the suit property is the total extent of 2172 sq.ft., over which, a residential house stands as of now. Karrmana Gounder had two children by name Ramasamy and Ponnammal. Ramasamy died on 24.09.1996 leaving behind his wife Saraswathi - third defendant and a daughter and son R. Veeralakshmi and R. Nallakumar/defendants 4 and 5. His another son died in 2002 as unmarried. The plaintiff is the son of Ponnammal, who died in the year 1952. Defendants 1 and 2 are the other daughter and son of Ponnammal. Defendants 6 to 8 are also the legal heirs through Ponnammal.

3. The suit has been laid by the plaintiff on two grounds. According to the plaintiff, the deceased Ramasamy had first wife by name Sorna @ Sornathal (since


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top