TEEKAA RAMAN
Shamshed Begum – Appellant
Versus
Sadiq Basha, Mansur Ahmed, Dilshad Begum, Sabirunnissa Bi, Boopathi, Pushparaj – Respondent
Teekaa Raman, J.
The unsuccessful plaintiff, in O.S.No.9 of 2005, on the file of the learned Additional District Judge, Dharmapuri, is the appellant herein.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per the ranking before the Trial Court.
3. The plaintiff filed a suit, in O.S.No.9 of 2005, before the learned Additional District Judge, Dharmapuri, for partition and separate possession and also for permanent injunction against the defendants 1 to 4 restraining them from in any way alienating the suit properties.
4. After contest, the suit was dismissed by the Trial Court, vide Judgment and Decree, dated 10.03.2006 and hence this appeal.
5. The brief averments of the plaint are as follows:
The lands, vacant site, houses more fully described in the Schedule of Property was acquired by Hashim Saheb, son of Gaiyub of Pennagaram, who possessed and enjoyed the same till he died on 12.06.2004. The suit properties, according to the Muslim Law, are in specific shares. The plaintiff and the third defendant are daughters, the defendants 1 and 2 are sons and the fourth defendant is the widow of Hashim Saheb. The plaintiff and the defendants 1 to 4 are in joint possession
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.