SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Mad) 1764

R.SUBRAMANIAN
Sri Krishna Sweets Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
M. Murali – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.P.S.Raman, Sr. Counsel, Mr.P.H.Aravind Pandian, Sr. Counsel Mr.W.H.Kane
For the Respondent: Mr.Satish Parasaran, Sr, Counsel for Mr. R.Parthasarathy

JUDGMENT :

The plaintiff in OS No. 425 of 2016 has come forward with these appeals, aggrieved by the order of the trial Court, namely III Additional District Judge, Coimbatore, dismissing its applications filed under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC seeking temporary injunction pending the suit.

2. The suit in OS.No.425 of 2016 has been filed by the plaintiff, which is a Private Limited Company, seeking permanent injunction restraining the defendant, his servants, dealers, distributors and agents from infringing the plaintiff's registered trade marks bearing Nos.404943, 484524 and 484525 by using the name and mark ‘Sri Krishna Sweets’ or any other name are mark containing the words ‘Krishna’ or any other name deceptively similar to the plaintiff's registered trademarks bearing the above numbers, for a permanent injunction restraining the defendant himself or any other person claiming under him from marketing, advertising Sweets and other similar goods in the name of ‘Sri Krishna Sweets’ or any other name deceptively similar to the well known name and mark of Sri Krishna Sweets or laun






























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top