SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Mad) 1627

M.V.MURALIDARAN
Subramaniam – Appellant
Versus
Pappammal – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr.R.T.Doraisamy

ORDER :

The plaintiff is the civil revision petitioner before this Court, challenging the official memorandum, dated 08.06.2012, on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Gobichettipalayam.

2. The case of the plaintiff is that he has filed the suit in O.S.No.3 of 2011 against the defendants for the prayer for declaration, partition, separate possession and for permanent injunction.

3. At the time of filing the suit was valued at Rs.1000/- and paid the Court fee at Rs.75.50/- as per Section 25(d) of the Court Fee Act. It is the case of the plaintiff is that the suit was filed for partition and he challenged two settlement deeds and one sale deed declared as null and void, since he was not a party to the sale deed as well as the settlement deed, he valued the suit property at the rate of Rs.1000/- and paid the Court fee at Rs.75.50/- as per Section 25(d) of the Court Fee Act.

4. While pendency of the suit, the learned Sub Judge, Gobichettipalayam has issued an official memorandum in Court Fee, cheque slips in O.S.No.3 of 2011 dated 08.06.2012 directing the plaintiffs by stating that though the plaintiffs have filed the suit for declaration, partition, separate possession and for perm



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top