SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Mad) 1618

N.AUTHINATHAN
T. Yellappa – Appellant
Versus
M. Nagarajan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr.Sharath Chander for M/s V.Raghavachari
For the Respondent: Mr.J.Hariharan for M/s V.Nicholas

JUDGMENT :

The complainant in S.T.C.No.34 of 2015 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court, Hosur is the appellant herein and the appeal has been preferred against the order of acquittal. The case of the complainant is that the respondent herein borrowed Rs.6,00,000/- on 28.03.2013 from him, promising to repay the same at the earliest and on the same day, he handed over a post dated cheque i.e. 21.11.2014, drawn on ICICI Bank, Hosur branch for Rs.6,00,000/-. When the cheque was presented for encashment, it was dishonored with an endorsement "funds insufficient". A legal notice was issued by the complainant to the respondent, informing about the dishonored cheque and calling upon him to repay the amount. The respondent did not respond the notice.

2. At the trial, the respondent has taken a plea that he is also a vegetable vendor; that he used to procure vegetables from the vegetable shop run by the complainant and his brother on credit basis; that in the course of business transaction, cheques were given to the complainant as security; that the amount payable towards purchase of vegetables has already been paid; that the cheque in question was handed over in blank form















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top