TEEKAA RAMAN
Sehu Fathima – Appellant
Versus
Peer Mohammed – Respondent
1. The plaintiff is the appellant herein. For the sake of convenience, parties are referred to as per the ranking before the trial Court. The appellant/plaintiff filed a suit before the Vacation Court, Tirunelveli in O.S. No. 25 of 1990 had been transferred to District Munsif Court, Valliyoor and re-numbered as O.S. No. 189 of 1996 and same has been transferred to District Munsif, Nanguneri. It is re-numbered as O.S. No. 945 of 1996.
2. The appellant/plaintiff filed a suit for declaration that declaring her property as a lessee or in the alter to enjoy the schedule property by constructing the house has permitted by the Panchayat and injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the suit property.
3. The brief averments of the plaint that are necessary to decide this appeal are as follows:
The plaintiff is in possession and enjoyment of the schedule properties by virtue of the sale deed executed by S.M. Nagoor Meeran Sahib S/o S. Mohammed Mohideen Tharaganar of Thiruvaranganeri on 17.05.1982 for Rs. 3,000/-. The plaintiff has applied to the Eruvadi Town Panchayat to construct the house with a plan. The plan of the plaintiff was appro
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.