SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Mad) 1998

V.M.VELUMANI
C. Meenambal (Deceased) – Appellant
Versus
Buharia Holdings Pvt. , Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. K. Rajasekaran.

ORDER :

1. The Civil Revision Petition is filed against the fair and decretal order dated 09.10.2012 made in I.A.No.8729 of 2012 in O.S.No.7182 of 2010 on the file of III Additional City Civil Court, Chennai.

2. The petitioners are the defendants and respondent is the plaintiff in O.S.No.7182 of 2010 on the file of the III Additional City Civil Court, Chennai. The respondent filed suit against the first petitioner/Meenambal for recovery of a sum of Rs.24,28,200/- based on two promissory notes dated 14.10.1999 for Rs.15,00,000/- and Rs.2,80,000/-. The third petitioner filed written statement on 12.11.2010 and is contesting the suit.

3. Pending suit, before filing written statement, the said Meenambal died and the petitioners 2 & 3 were impleaded as her legal heirs. Pending C.R.P., the second petitioner also died and third petitioner is the only legal heir of the petitioners 1 & 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners filed a memo to that effect.

4. The respondent filed I.A.No.8729 of 2012 under Section 20 of the Negotiable Instruments Act read with Section 151 C.P.C. to permit him to fill the name of the respondent as payee and name of the first petitioner as drawer in the demand pro











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top