BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
K.K. SASIDHARAN, G.R. SWAMINATHAN, JJ.
Pavakkai Mandapam Trust, Madurai Represented by its Trustee, R.K. Ramachandran @ Ramesh - Petitioner
Versus
Tamil Nadu Housing Board Madurai Division Rep. by its Executive Engineer & Ors. -Respondents
W.P(MD)No.4429 of 2017, W.M.P(MD)Nos.3564 & 4353 of 2017
Decided On : 08-09-2017
Charitable Trust - Property Dispute - Tamil Nadu Housing Board Act, 1961 - Section 84
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a Charitable Trust, owned land on which shops were constructed for funding religious and charitable activities. The Tamil Nadu Housing Board issued a communication to remove the shops, claiming unauthorized occupation of their land. The petitioner contested, providing evidence of their ownership and approval for construction.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner Trust owned the land in question and had legal materials to support their claim. It held that the Housing Board's authority to evict unauthorized occupants did not apply in the presence of a genuine title dispute.
Issues: The main issue was the ownership of the land and the validity of the Housing Board's claim of unauthorized occupation.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the Housing Board's power to evict unauthorized occupants did not apply when a genuine title dispute existed. It emphasized the importance of natural justice and fair adjudication in resolving property disputes.
Final Decision: The court quashed the Housing Board's order to remove the shops, citing the petitioner's ownership, legal materials, and the presence of a genuine title dispute. It allowed the writ petition and closed the case without costs.
G.R. SWAMINATHAN, J.
1. The writ petitioner is a Charitable Trust. It owns 20 cents of land. in Survey Nos.1/1 Part and 3/1 Part and 7 in Villapuram Village, Madurai South Taluk. It constructed a few shops in the said survey numbers after obtaining permission from the Madurai Corporation way back in the years 1974 and 1980. The rent received from the said shops is utilized for funding its religious and charitable activities. On the 4th day of annual Chithirai festival celebrated in Madurai, Goddess Meenakshi visits the Pavakkai Mandapam situated in the said land. The adjoining lands are owned by Tamil Nadu Housing Board. Since there was no right of access from the highway, the petitioner Trust at the request of Madurai Corporation executed a sale deed dated 29.04.1994 in favour of the first respondent Board conveying a portion of their land measuring 572 Sq. ft.
2. While so, at the instance of the second respondent herein, the first respondent Board issued the impugned communication dated 02.03.2017 calling upon the trustee to remove the shops in question. The first respondent has stated in the impugned communication that the shops in question have been unauthorizedly put up on the land belonging to the first respondent Board. It is made clear in the said communication that if the petitioner does not remove the shops, the same would be demolished with the aid of police and taken possession thereafter. Aggrieved by the said communication dated 02.03.2017, the petitioner Trust filed this writ petition.
3. It is the stand of the writ petitioner that the land in question is their absolute property. They have enclosed materials dating back to 1969. The trust itself is a very old one. The trust had applied under the provisions of Tamil Nadu Estates (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1948 and obtained patta for an extent of 10 cents in Survey No.1/1 Part, 6 cents in 3/1 Part and 4 cents in Survey No.7 Part (Total 20 cents) in Villapuram Village. They have enclosed a copy of the proceedings bearing R.Dis.3405/G/74, dated 28.02.1974. The Assistant Settlement Officer, Madurai-2 had recommended grant of patta in favour of the trustee of Pavakkai Mandapam Trust. That is how, patta came to be issued in favour of the Trust way back on 09.04.1974. The petitioner has also enclosed the correspondence that took place between them and the Madurai Corporation for conveying a portion of their land measuring an extent of 572 Sq. ft in favour of the first respondent Board. It is also a matter of record that the shops in question were constructed only after getting prior approval from the local body. While so, it appears that the second respondent has been complaining to the authorities that the petitioner Trust had committed encroachment on the lands belonging to the Tamil Nadu Housing Board. That led to be initiation of the present proceedings by the first respondent.
4. The first respondent Board had filed their counter affidavit. In the counter affidavit, the first respondent placed reliance on the proceedings of the District Collector, Madurai dated 17.02.1988 where under permission was accorded to the Board to enter upon the land measuring an extent of 54.87 acres in S.No.1/1 in Villapuram village and an extent of 220.46 acres in S.No.411/1 in Avaniapuram village. According to the first respondent, the entire S.No.1/1 of Villapuram village belongs to the Housing Board.
5. In view of the said proceedings of the District Collector, Madurai, the first respondent had issued show cause notice dated 29.07.2016, directing the writ petitioner to furnish documents to prove their right over the same. Since no reply was received, the impugned order came to be passed. The first respondent prayed for dismissal of the writ petition.
6. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
7. Tamil Nadu Housing Board is a body corporate having been constituted by the Tamil Nadu State Housing Board Act, 1961. It is a self contained Statute. The Act enables the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.