SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Mad) 2198

V.M.VELUMANI
Kathiravan – Appellant
Versus
Raju – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr.S.Janarthanan
For the Respondent: Mr.C.Prabakaran

ORDER :

1. These Civil Revision Petitions are filed against the fair and decretal order dated 08.10.2009 made in I.A.No.1266 of 2009 in I.A.No.366 of 2005 & I.A.No.562 of 2009 in I.A.No.365 of 2005 in M.C.O.P.No.257 of 2003 on the file of the District Court, Perambalur.

2. The petitioner, who is the owner of the vehicle, is the first respondent, first respondent is the claimant and second respondent/Insurance Company is the second respondent in M.C.O.P.No.257 of 2003. The first respondent filed the said claim petition claiming a sum of Rs.8,00,000/- as compensation for the injuries sustained by him in the accident that was occurred on 28.08.2000.

3. According to the first respondent, the accident occurred only due to rash and negligent driving by driver of the vehicle belonging to the petitioner and insured with second respondent and hence, he claimed compensation from both the petitioner and second respondent. The petitioner remained exparte.

4. The second respondent filed counter denying the involvement of the TATA Sumo vehicle bearing Registration No.TN- 65B-5170 in the accident and submitted that F.I.R. has been registered belatedly and the driver of the vehicle was not having vali










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top