SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Mad) 2279

RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN
Niutya Gopal – Appellant
Versus
Anil Kumar Verma – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. D. Nagesh Babu, Mr. R. Subramanian

ORDER :

This Criminal Revision Case is filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C., to set aside the order dated 29.07.2011 passed by the learned II Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai, in Crl.M.P.No.673 of 2011.

2. The respondent is complainant before the trial Court and he has filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act), along with a petition to condone the delay of 297 days in filing the complaint and the same was allowed by the learned II Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai. As against the said order, the present criminal revision case is preferred by the revision petitioner/accused.

3. The summary of facts leading to the filing of the above revision are as follows:-

(i) The respondent herein/complainant has filed a petition in Crl.M.P.No.673 of 2011 to condone the delay of 297 days in filing the complaint under Section 138 of the Act against the revision petitioner herein/accused.

(ii) The respondent herein/complainant stated that he has deposited a cheque alleged to have been given by the petitioner on 12.05.2010 and on bouncing, the respondent herein issued a statutory notice on 25.05.2010, for which, the re




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top