1. This petition has been filed to accept the cause title of the above referred revision case.

2. According to the petitioner some properties/materials belonging to her had been seized by the respondent police, from the shop premises run by the petitioner, on the pretext that they were stolen by the accused, who is none other than the husband of the petitioner. The said seized properties were produced before the Court below. The first respondent, who is the authorized representative of the defacto complainant, had filed a petition before the Court below under Section 451 of Cr.P.C. seeking interim custody of those goods seized from the premises of the petitioner.

3. The learned Magistrate, after hearing the first respondent therein as well as the respondent police in the said case, has passed an order on 12.05.2017 in Crl. M.P. No. 1254 of 2017 in F.I.R. No. 806 of 2017. By the said order, the learned Magistrate directed the goods to be given to the first respondent for interim custody on condition that the first respondent shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs. 80,000/- and also on condition that the first respondent shall not tamper or alter the goods and he shall produce the