INDIRA BANERJEE, M.SUNDAR
Shinago Holdings Private Limited, Chennai – Appellant
Versus
M. Ethiraj – Respondent
M.SUNDAR, J.
This intra-court appeal is directed against an order dated 13.04.2017 made by a learned Single Judge on the Original Side of this court in two applications taken out under various sub sections of Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as 'A and C Act' for the sake of brevity).
2. Vide the aforesaid order dated 13.4.2017, which is a common order in two applications, learned Single Judge has granted interim measures sought for in both the applications under Section 9 of the A and C Act.
3. A perusal of the memorandum of grounds of Original Side Appeals in the instant intra-court appeal before us reveals that these appeals have been filed under Order XXXVI Rule 9 of the Original Side Rules of this Court read with Clause 15 of the Letters Patent. It is clearly impermissible, in the light of section 37 of the A and C Act and in the light of the elucidation on this aspect of the matter by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Fuerst Day Lawson Limited Vs. Jindal Exports Limited [(2011) 8 SCC 333]. Therefore, without standing on technicalities, we treat this as appeals under Section 37 of the A and C Act, under Section 37(1)(b)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.