SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Mad) 2449

M.V.MURALIDARAN
G. Rajalakshmi – Appellant
Versus
S. Loganathan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. T.M. Ramalingam
For the Respondent: Mr. S. Ramasundaram

ORDER :

The petitioner has filed this Civil Revision Petition to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 18.03.2011 in I.A.No.200 of 2008 in O.S.No.628 of 2003 on the file of the I Additional Sub Judge, Salem.

2. The defendant is the revision petitioner and the respondent herein as plaintiff has filed the suit for specific performance and permanent injunction against the revision petitioner herein in O.S.No.628 of 2003 on file of I Additional Sub Judge, Salem.

3. The case of the revision petitioner is that the respondent herein is an unknown person to him and he had no transaction whatsoever. However, the respondent, who is the henchman of one Gopal has come up with the above suit on the basis of a forged sale agreement which came to be illegally printed on the blank stamp papers issued to the said Gopal by this revision petitioner for a security purpose for a hand loan raised to the tune of Rs.25,000/- by the revision petitioner from the said Gopal. Further the parental deeds of the suit schedule property, besides blank stamp papers signed by the revision petitioner were handed over to the said Gopal as a security. The said loan was availed by the revision petitioner at the rate










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top