S.VAIDYANATHAN
P. A. G. Kumaran – Appellant
Versus
Inspector General of Registration, Santhome, Chennai – Respondent
The petitioner has come forward with this Writ Petition praying for issuance of a Writ of Declaration to declare that the impugned Deed of Cancellation, dated 10.11.2014, registered as Document No.3328 of 2014 on the file of the second respondent, as null and void and non-est in law.
2. According to the petitioner, the respondents 1 and 2 ought not to have registered the impugned cancellation deed, cancelling the settlement deed already registered, when the property in question has devolved upon the petitioner by means of settlement deed, dated 10.06.2005. It is true that the property was purchased on 27.10.1983 by the third respondent. According to the petitioner, there was no notice from the Registrar Office and that when there is disputed questions of fact involved, the same has got to be resolved only in the Civil Court. Further, it is the case of the petitioner that he married the third respondent in 1977 and after their marriage, the third respondent purchased the property, which is the subject matter of the dispute that had been settled in his favour and thereafter, the cancellation of deed, cancelling the settlement deed, was registered by the second respondent. The p
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.