SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Mad) 2498

M.V.MURALIDARAN
D. Sundararajan – Appellant
Versus
G. Hemalatha – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. R. Manickavel
For the Respondents: Mr. M. Christopher

ORDER :

The petitioner has filed this Civil Revision Petition to set aside the order passed by the learned V Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai, made in I.A.No.17205 of 2010 in O.S.No.8631 of 2005, dated 11.09.2012, by allowing the same.

2. The case of the revision petitioner is that the 1st respondent herein has filed a suit for permanent injunction in O.S.No.8631 of 2005 as against the revision petitioner. On the receipt of notice from the trial Court the revision petitioner entered appearance through a counsel. Thereupon the revision petitioner was under an impression that his counsel would take care of the case. That apart the said counsel also filed a suit in O.S.No.8858 of 2005 on behalf of the revision petitioner before the learned VIII Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai. Therefore, the revision petitioner was under a bonafide belief that his counsel would take care of both the suits. Being so, in the last week of June 2010 the 1st respondent herein illegally trespassed into the suit property, for which the revision petitioner immediately approached his counsel instructing him to get an urgent orders to prevent the 1st respondent s illegal trespass. However, th











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top