ANITA SUMANTH
Shriram City Union Finance Limited – Appellant
Versus
Samarath Engineering Works (Firm), Represented by its Partner – Respondent
1. This Original Application filed in terms of section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 (in short ‘Act’) prays for the appointment of a Receiver to administer the property of the respondents morefully described in the schedule to the Judges Summons pending disposal of proceedings for arbitration and enforcement of award.
2. Along with the application, the applicant remitted court fee of a sum of Rs.200/- in terms of Rule 1 of Appendix II to the High Court Fee Rules being of the view that the application was incapable of valuation. Order II of the High Court Fee Rules prescribes a levy of fee in accordance with the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 and Rules framed thereunder and as per the scale of fee set out in Appendix II to the High Court Fee Rules. According to the applicant, the applicable provision would be the following:
APPENDIX II
COURT FEES
Serial Number
Description of document or proceeding
Amount
(1)
(2)
(3)
Fees to be levied by the Registrar of the High Court 1.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.