SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Mad) 2519

ANITA SUMANTH
Shriram City Union Finance Limited – Appellant
Versus
Samarath Engineering Works (Firm), Represented by its Partner – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Applicant : Sri. & Shankar Associates, R. Umashankar, M. Sridevi

JUDGMENT :

1. This Original Application filed in terms of section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 (in short ‘Act’) prays for the appointment of a Receiver to administer the property of the respondents morefully described in the schedule to the Judges Summons pending disposal of proceedings for arbitration and enforcement of award.

2. Along with the application, the applicant remitted court fee of a sum of Rs.200/- in terms of Rule 1 of Appendix II to the High Court Fee Rules being of the view that the application was incapable of valuation. Order II of the High Court Fee Rules prescribes a levy of fee in accordance with the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 and Rules framed thereunder and as per the scale of fee set out in Appendix II to the High Court Fee Rules. According to the applicant, the applicable provision would be the following:

APPENDIX II

COURT FEES

Serial Number

Description of document or proceeding

Amount

(1)

 

 

(2)

 

 

(3)

 

 

Fees to be levied by the Registrar of the High Court 1.



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top