IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.VENUGOPAL, P.D.AUDIKESAVALU, JJ.
M.Ragavan – Petitioner
Vs.
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tiruvannamalai, Tiruvannamalai District - Respondent
W.P.No.8140 of 2017
Decided on : 24-07-2017
Community Certificate - Scheduled Tribe - G.O.(Ms).No.235 Revenue [RA3(2)] Department dated 26.06.2015, G.O.(Ms).No.147 Revenue [RA-3(2)] Department dated 17.03.2016 - The judgment discusses the provisions of G.O.(Ms).No.235 Revenue [RA3(2)] Department dated 26.06.2015 and G.O.(Ms).No.147 Revenue [RA-3(2)] Department dated 17.03.2016, which provide for the issuance of Community Certificates for Scheduled Tribes and the introduction of an 'Appeal' remedy before the District Collector and the State Level Scrutiny Committee for redressal of grievances. The court emphasizes the importance of enacting a comprehensive law for the issuance and verification of Community Certificates for Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe and Other Backward Classes in the State, in line with the guidelines issued by the Supreme Court.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a Writ Petition seeking an order to quash the rejection of his request for a Community Certificate for himself and his sons, who belong to the 'Kattunayakan (ST) Community'. The petitioner's application for the certificate was rejected without proper enquiry by the Revenue Divisional Officer.
Finding of the Court:
The court directed the petitioner to prefer an Appeal before the District Collector within two weeks, emphasizing the importance of providing an adequate opportunity for hearing and adhering to the 'Principles of Natural Justice'. The court also highlighted the need for enacting a comprehensive law for the issuance and verification of Community Certificates.
Issues: Rejection of Community Certificate, Introduction of 'Appeal' remedy, Enactment of comprehensive law for Community Certificates
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of providing an 'Appeal' remedy before the District Collector and the State Level Scrutiny Committee for redressal of grievances in cases related to Community Certificates. The court also highlighted the need for enacting a comprehensive law for the issuance and verification of Community Certificates.
Final Decision: The petitioner was directed to prefer an Appeal before the District Collector within two weeks, and the District Collector was instructed to pass necessary orders on the 'Appeal' expeditiously and send a compliance report to the court. The Writ Petition was disposed of with observations on the need for enacting a comprehensive law for Community Certificates.
M.VENUGOPAL, J.
Heard both sides.
2. The Petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition praying for passing of an order by this Court in calling for the records relating to the order of rejection passed in A2/2819/2015 dated 09.10.2015 on the file of the Respondent/Revenue Divisional Officer, Tiruvannamalai and to quash the same. Further, the Petitioner had prayed for issuance of direction to the Respondent to issue Community Certificate to the petitioner and his sons viz., 1.R.Udhaya Prakash and 2.R.Vignesh to the effect that they belong to ‘Kattunayakan (ST) Community, based upon the proceedings of the District Level Vigilance Committee passed in favour of the petitioner's brother M.Paramasivam in proceedings No.Na.Ka.Ke4/47140/2003 dated 30.08.2006.
3. According to the Petitioner, he belongs to 'Kattunayakan Community' which is classified as a Scheduled Tribe Community. The Petitioner's wife also belongs to Kattunayakan (ST) Community. They are agricultural coolie. The Petitioner and his wife did not obtain Community Certificate, since it was not required for them. Now, for educational and employment purpose, the Petitioner's sons are required Community Certificate. Therefore, the Petitioner has filed an application to the Respondent on 08.05.2015 seeking issuance of Community Certificate for his Wards. In support of his claim, the Petitioner has enclosed the following documents along with the application:
1. Community Certificate issued to the petitioner's own brother M.Paramasivam dated 15.12.2014 by the Respondent.
2. District Level Vigilance Committee genuine report in respect of petitioner's brother M.Paramasivam.
Though the application was received by the Respondent on 11.05.2015, there was no order was passed so far. Hence, the Petitioner filed a Writ Petition in W.P.No.20718 of 2015 before this Court and this Court had passed the order on 10.07.2015 directing the Respondent to consider the petitioner's application dated 08.05.2015, hold proper enquiry and examine the documents/certificates qua their blood relatives produced by them, which have probative value and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order.
4. It comes to be known that without conducting any enquiry, the Respondent/Revenue Divisional Officer, Tiruvannamalai, had passed the impugned order dated 09.10.2015 rejecting the Petitioner's request for issuance of Community Certificate to the petitioner and his wards, viz., R.Udaya Prakash and R.Vignesh. Therefore, as an affected person, against the order of negativing his request for issuance of Community Certificate dated 09.10.2015 by the Respondent, the Petitioner has filed the instant Writ Petition before this Court.
5. At this juncture, it is pertinent for this Court to make a significant mention that in G.O.(Ms).No.235 Revenue [RA3(2)] Department dated 26.06.2015, the Government of Tamilnadu based on the orders passed by the Madurai Division Bench of this Court in W.P.(MD) No. 1355 of 2015 dated 05.02.2015 between D.Thirupathi V. The District Collector, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli and another, had constituted an Appellate Authority for an 'Appeal' remedy in regard to the issuance of Community Certificate, which runs as under:
Sl.
Community
Issuing Authority
Appellate Authority
Redressal of Grievances
1
Backward Classes /Most Backward Classes/Denotified Communities
Zonal Deputy Tahsildar
Tahsildar
District Collector
2
Scheduled Castes
Tahsildar
Revenue Divisional Officer
District Collector
3
Scheduled Tribes
Revenue Divisional Officer
District Collector
District Collector & Chairman District Level Vigilance Committee
6. It also comes to light that the Government of Tamilnadu had passed G.O.(Ms).No.147 Revenue [RA-3(2)] Department
Babubhai V. Nandal AIR 1974 SC 2105
G.J.Fernandez V. State of Mysore reported in AIR 1967 SC 1753
Kumari Madhuri Patil & Another V. Additional Commissioner Tribal Development
Madhukar Sadbha Shivarkar V. State of Maharashtra and Others (2015) 6 SCC 557
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.