SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Mad) 2635

S.S.SUNDAR
Udaiyar – Appellant
Versus
Accountant General (A&E) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. S. Visvalingam for P. Krishnasamy
For the Respondents:Mr. P. Gunasekaran, Standing Counsel for Accountant General Office, Mr. M. Murugan Government Advocate

ORDER :

1. The above Writ Petitions have been filed to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the Respondents to sanction the Pensionary benefits to the Petitioners from the date of appointment calculating the Petitioners’ service from the date of their appointment.

2. The petitioners in all these Writ Petitions were originally appointed as “Thalayari/Village Assistant” on different dates between the year 1973 and 1981. Though the petitioners in these Writ Petitions were appointed on permanent basis, they were not given any fixed regular time scale of pay, having regard to the nature of work. Though the petitioners in all these Writ Petitions were working continuously, their service were regularized only in the year 1995 with effect form 01.06.1995. The period between which the petitioners were appointed and served as Thalayari on consolidated pay and the date on which the petitioners were absorbed as Village Assistant and working in the regular time scale of pay are indicated in the table given below:-

Sl.No

Name of the petitioner

Period Served as Thalayari on consolidate































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top