P.VELMURUGAN
Senthil Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu Represented by the Inspector of Police – Respondent
1. The instant appeal has been preferred against the judgment dated 29.12.2009 rendered by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge/FTC-I, Coimbatore in S.C.No.107 of 2009 where by the appellant/accused (herein after referred to as accused 1 and 2 for the sake of convenient) who were charged with and tried for commission of offences u/s.307 IPC has been convicted and sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of one year and to pay a fine of Rs.1000/- in default RI for three months for the offence punishable under Section 324 IPC and the accused A2 is convicted and sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for six months and to pay a fine of Rs.500/- in default Simple Imprisonment for two months for the offence punishable under Section 323 IPC. The period of sentence already undergone is ordered to be set off under Section 428 Cr.P.C.
2. The case of the prosecution in a nutshell is that one Veerasamy, resident of Thiru.Vi.Ka.Nagar, Urmandampalayam, is working as a Mason. Pappathi is his sister and wife of Murugesan, who is working as a building mason. The accused were working under the said Murugesan. There was a balance of coolly amount due by Muru
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.