M.V.MURALIDARAN
Kamalesan – Appellant
Versus
R. Pushpagaran – Respondent
The plaintiff has filed the present suit in O.S.No.39 of 2009 before the learned Principal District Court, Dharmapuri, for partition of the suit schedule of property.
2. The respondents/defendants 1 and 2 were filed objections.
3. While pendency of the suit and prayed for dismissal of the suit against the defendants 1 to 5.
4. The 3rd defendant in the suit in O.S.No.39 of 2009 has filed the Interlocutory Application in I.A.No.184 of 2010 with a prayer to implead the proposed parties 1 to 6 as defendants 6 to 11 in the suit. It is the case of the 3rd defendant is that the respondents 1 and 2/the plaintiffs 1 and 2 for wantonly suppressed the income of the joint family made by way of rents from the letting out the shop in the Item No.2 of the suit property. The Item No.5 of the suit schedule of property has also been let out on the monthly rents by the respondents/plaintiffs and the rental income of the joint family has also been deliberately concealed by the respondents/plaintiffs with ulterior motive.
5. The 3rd defendant also states that the defendants all these item Nos.2 and 5 of the suit properties are proper necessary parties to the suit and for disposal of the suit fairly
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.