SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Mad) 2797

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
S.S. SUNDAR, J.
T. Pandi - Petitioner
Vs.
The Secretary to Government & Ors. - Respondents
W.P.(MD).No.4825 of 2017 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.3850 to 3851and 6469 of 2017
Decided On : 17-07-2017

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Veerakathiravan, Senior Counsel, M/s. Veera Associates
For the Respondent:Mr. B. Pugalendhi, Addl. Advocate General, Assisted by Mr. K.K. Senthil

The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of the Tamil Nadu Fire Service Rules, G.O.(D) No.119 Home (Police-17) Department dated 18.02.2015, Act 14, of 2016, and G.O.Ms.No.91, Personnel and Administrative Reforms (S) Department, dated 14.08.2015 in determining the availability of posts for direct recruitment and the impact on the petitioner's promotion.

Headnote:

Recruitment - District Fire Officer - Tamil Nadu Fire Service Rules - Clause-2 of Category-II - G.O.(D) No.119 Home (Police-17) Department dated 18.02.2015 - Act 14, of 2016 - Tamil Nadu Government Servants (Conditions of Service) Act, 2016 - G.O.Ms.No.91, Personnel and Administrative Reforms (S) Department, dated 14.08.2015 - Rule 6 of General Rules for Tamil Nadu State Subordinate Services - [KEYWORD] - [SUBJECT] - [Tamil Nadu Fire Service Rules, G.O.(D) No.119 Home (Police-17) Department dated 18.02.2015, Act 14, of 2016, G.O.Ms.No.91, Personnel and Administrative Reforms (S) Department, dated 14.08.2015, Rule 6 of General Rules for Tamil Nadu State Subordinate Services] - The court discussed the Tamil Nadu Fire Service Rules, G.O.(D) No.119 Home (Police-17) Department dated 18.02.2015, Act 14, of 2016, and G.O.Ms.No.91, Personnel and Administrative Reforms (S) Department, dated 14.08.2015 to determine the validity of the recruitment notification and its compliance with the service rules. The court also considered the implications of the Tamil Nadu Government Servants (Conditions of Service) Act, 2016 on seniority and the validating provision in Section 70 of the Act. The interpretation of Rule 6 of General Rules for Tamil Nadu State Subordinate Services was crucial in calculating the total cadre strength of permanent posts of District Officer and earmarking posts for direct recruitment and recruitment by transfer. The court's decision was influenced by the legal provisions and their interpretations, particularly in determining the availability of posts for direct recruitment and the impact on the petitioner's promotion.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought to quash a recruitment notification for District Fire Officer and direct the filling of existing vacancies by transfer of service as per Tamil Nadu Fire Service Rules. The petitioner, an Assistant Divisional Fire Officer, claimed entitlement to promotion to the post of Divisional Fire Officer based on the sanctioned cadre strength and the ratio of promotion to direct recruitment. The respondents contested the petitioner's claims and the validity of the recruitment notification.

Finding of the Court:

The court dismissed the Writ Petition, finding it devoid of merits. The court accepted the respondents' contentions regarding the availability of posts for direct recruits and the compliance with service rules. The court's decision was influenced by the factual analysis of the sanctioned strength and the interpretation of relevant service rules.

Issues: The issues revolved around the validity of the recruitment notification, the entitlement to promotion based on sanctioned cadre strength and the ratio of promotion to direct recruitment, and the impact of pending Writ Appeals on seniority and promotion.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the factual analysis of the sanctioned strength, the interpretation of relevant service rules, and the compliance with the ratio of promotion to direct recruitment. The court's acceptance of the respondents' contentions regarding the availability of posts for direct recruits and the compliance with service rules influenced the final decision.

Final Decision: The Writ Petition was dismissed as devoid of merits, and the connected W.M.P. (MD) Nos.3850 to 3851and 6469 of 2017 were closed. No Costs were awarded.

ORDER :

1. This Writ Petition has been filed to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to quash the recruitment notification issued by the second respondent dated 09.11.2016 insofar as the same relates to Sl.No.6 calling for application to fill up eight posts of District Fire Officer/Divisional Fire Officer and to direct the respondents to fill up the existing vacancies immediately by transfer of service as per Tamil Nadu Fire Service Rules.

2. The case of the petitioner in the affidavit filed in support of the Writ Petition are as follows:

2.1. The petitioner was originally appointed as Station Officer Grade-I in the Tamil Nadu Fire Subordinate Services under the third respondent. The petitioner was promoted in the year 2011 as Assistant District Fire Officer, now known as Assistant Divisional Fire Officer. Upto the posts of Assistant District Fire Officer/Assistant Divisional Fire Officer, the employees come under the Tamil Nadu Fire Subordinate Service Rules and from the next post of Divisional Fire Officer/District Fire Officer, the employees come under the purview of the Tamil Nadu Fire Service Rules. The appointing Authority to the post of Divisional Fire Officer is the first respondent. The post, which was previously known as District Fire Officer is re-designated as Divisional Fire Officer by the first respondent. The post of Divisional Fire Officer comes under Clause-2 of Category-II of the Tamil Nadu Fire Service Rules.

2.2. The said post can be filled up by promotion and also by direct recruitment in the ratio of 2:1. The feeder category for the post is the Assistant Divisional Fire Officer. Though it is called as promotion, actually it is a transfer of service from the Tamil Nadu Fire Subordinate Service Rules. The Government issued in G.O.(D) No.119 Home (Police-17) Department dated 18.02.2015, declaring the total sanctioned post of Divisional Fire Officer as 17. Since the category cadre strength of Divisional Fire Officer, which is a permanent post is only 17 and already 5 persons, who were directly recruited as Divisional Fire Officers are working, out of the remaining vacant posts, which represent 2/3 of the cadre strength has to be filled up only by promotion, from the post of Assistant Divisional Fire Officer. The petitioner, who is working in the feeder category for more than 6 years is entitled to be considered for promotion. However, by the impugned notification, the second respondent has called for applications to fill up 8 vacancies in the post of Divisional Fire Officer/District Fire Officer.

2.3. Having regard to the sanctioned cadre strength of Divisional Fire Officer, there is no vacancy that can be filled up by direct recruitment by the respondents. Since already 1/3 vacancies meant for direct recruitment had been filled up, all the remaining vacancies are only to be filled up either by promotion or by transfer of service. Though there are 17 temporary posts created in the recent years, the permanent post alone can be filled up and therefore by creating temporary post, there cannot be fresh recruitment which is not permissible under the service Rules. Since the 8 posts of District Fire Officer/Divisional Fire Officer which are meant for accommodating the Assistant Divisional Fire Officer, the feeder category, the impugned notification calling upon applications by direct recruitment is illegal in as much as no post is vacant for direct recruitment as per the Rules. It is only for the above reason, it is stated that the petitioner is constrained to file the present Writ Petition challenging the recruitment notification insofar as the same relates to the filling up of 8 post of Divisional Fire Officer/District Fire Officer.

3. The third respondent file a detailed counter inter alia pointing out the following facts:

3.1. It is stated in the counter that the post of District Fire Officer was re-designated as Divisional Fire Officer is not correct as the post of Divisional Fire Officer has been re-designated a











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top