SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Mad) 2800

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
S.S. SUNDAR, J.
Rakesh - Petitioner
Vs.
The Inspector of Police, Madurai City & Ors. - Respondents
Crl.O.P.(MD) No.9082 of 2017 And Crl.M.P(MD) Nos.6164 and 6165 of 2017
Decided On : 17-07-2017

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: M/s. T.R. Subramanian
For the Respondent:Mr. K. Anbarasan Government Advocate

The court cannot conclude on facts at the stage of quashing a criminal case based solely on the version of the accused or the statement of one witness.

Headnote:

Quash Petition - Criminal Offence - The court dismissed the petition to quash the charge-sheet filed against the petitioner for committing an offence under Section 366 of IPC, despite the petitioner's reliance on the victim's marriage invitation and her mother's suspicion.

Fact of the Case:

The charge-sheet was filed against the petitioner for committing an offence under Section 366 of IPC, alleging that the petitioner took a minor girl and committed the offence on the false promise of marrying her. The petitioner relied on the victim's marriage invitation and her mother's suspicion, but the court found no reason to quash the charge-sheet.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner's reliance on the victim's marriage invitation and her mother's suspicion was not sufficient to quash the charge-sheet, as the charge-sheet was filed after enquiry and the court could not conclude on facts at the stage of quashing the criminal case.

Issues: The issues involved the petitioner's attempt to quash the charge-sheet based on the victim's marriage invitation and her mother's suspicion, and the court's assessment of the sufficiency of these grounds.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the fact that the charge-sheet was filed after enquiry, and the court could not conclude on facts at the stage of quashing the criminal case based solely on the version of the accused or the statement of one witness.

Final Decision: The Criminal Original Petition was dismissed with cost of Rs.1000/- to be payable by the Petitioner to the credit of Chief Justice Relief Fund of the Court, and connected Miscellaneous Petitions were also dismissed.

ORDER :

1. This Criminal Original Petition has been filed praying this Court to call for the records relating to the proceedings in P.R.C.No.1 of 2017, on the file of Additional Mahila Court, Madurai and to quash the same.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the first respondent and perused the materials placed before this Court.

3. Pursuant to the complaint of girl missing, a charge-sheet has been filed against the Petitioner alleging that the Petitioner has committed an offence under Section 366 of IPC. The Charge-sheet would disclose that the Petitioner has taken the minor girl and committed the offence on the false promise of marrying her.

4. The learned counsel for the Petitioner would rely upon the Marriage Invitation of the victim stating that the victim got married to another boy of her choice. The learned counsel would further rely upon the statement of the mother of the victim earlier stating that she had a suspicion that her daughter would have been taken by the Petitioner. The submission of the learned counsel for the Petitioner has no merit. The statement of the mother of the victim at the time of giving the complaint cannot be a reason to quash the charge-sheet, when the charge-sheet is filed after enquiry. The Petitioner himself has stated that the complaint was originally registered as one for girl missing. The other contention that the victim has got married to another boy cannot be a reason to quash the charge-sheet, wherein the Petitioner has been charged for the offence under Section 366 of IPC. This Court, at this stage of quashing the criminal case cannot conclude on facts by taking the version of the accused or simply relying upon the statement of one of the witness or the subsequent fact that the victim girl has got married to another boy. This Court finds no reason to quash the charge-sheet registered against the Petitioner and the same is devoid of merits.

5. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed with cost of Rs.1000/- to be payable by the Petitioner to the credit of Chief Justice Relief Fund of this Court. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are dismissed.



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top